“Hitting Dowry for a Six” is an article written by former Deputy Editor and Chief of Bureau of The Hindu, Ms.Kalpana Sharma. It has been published in The Hindu, 1st June 2003. The article focuses on women empowerment and discusses the topic of dowry which is a widespread social evil in India.
Hitting Dowry For A Six Summary:
Written by Kalpana Sharma, the article is based on the anti-dowry movement started by Nisha Sharma in 2003 and compares it to the 1970’s movement started by Satyarani Chaddha. This article is an approach by Kalpana Sharma to encourage modern women to fight against such evils and tell the world the importance of women in human society.
Nisha Sharma’s and Satyarani Chaddha’s Case
Hitting Dowry For A Six Summary: Nisha Sharma’s case is widely different from Satyarani Chaddha’s case but always reminds the public of the anti-dowry movement started by her. Nisha Sharma continued to meet her laws’ each and every unreasonable demand until they could not afford it so with the help of her parents, Nisha was able to fight those demands. On the other hand, there is Satyarani Chaddha who only took a step when her daughter was killed because her family wasn’t able to meet the martial family’s demands. Nisha’s courage was widely acknowledged by the whole country. The writer says that all the women who have become the target of dowry shouldn’t mask their faces as they are not alone and should stand up for themelves against dowry otherwise there would be no use of Nisha’s and Satyarani Chaddha’s efforts.
Reasonable and Unreasonable Demands
Hitting Dowry For A Six Summary: Kalpana Sharma discusses the reasonable and unreasonable demands and that why a bride should meet them. Why are there any reasonable demands that the bride has to pay even after providing the additional domestic help to the martial family. A bride is asked to bring a scooter, drawer, washing machine, TV, fridge, furniture, cupboards to her martial house otherwise she becomes a burden. The article questions this perspective of Indian mentality that how a woman who works all day long to serve the laws’ family becomes a burden for them. In some cases, the bride is expected to bring unreasonable amounts of clothes like 21,31,51 sarees and all with different matching petticoats. All these demands are not reasonable at all and in the end becomes a price for the bride’s family which they even have to pay in advance.
The writer says that if all the women didn’t stand against this evil then the cases of Nisha Sharma and Satyarani Chaddha would be eventually forgotten and would remain as a part of school children’s textbooks only.
Education Does Not Matter
Hitting Dowry For A Six Summary: The article has given an example to prove that education does not mean anything when it’s a woman’s turn to stand up for herself. In Nisha’s case, she was very qualified and knew when to shout against the injustice done to her but there are also cases where the bride was not much qualified but still she stood against her laws’ demands. On the other hand, Surveys have proved that even in a state like Kerela, which has the maximum number of qualified woman, dowry demands have still continued to exist.
So if it is not education then what helps a woman in standing against her laws. According to the writer, it is the support of the girl’s parents that matter. In a society like India, the “yes” and “no” of the bride only depends on the amount of support she receives. Unless a large no. of parents start fighting against dowry, no change will take place. We can also hope for a day when the boys themselves will not ask for dowry but then again, on that day the boy would be the dominating gender.
Freedom To Work
Hitting Dowry For A Six Summary: After a girl’s marriage, her husband also becomes the deciding factor that whether she will work outside the house or not; A modern man is not afraid to call a professional woman modern, but after marriage, the same modern man asks the woman to become a housewife. What a coincidence is this that the woman who achieves so much after working for hours for her family, in the end, turns up to be a housewife. Another amusing thing is that after marriage, the woman is allowed to work but only after her martial family’s consent if their son’s income is low. It means that if the husband has a low income then his wife is allowed to work otherwise a housewife is the only option left for her.
Advantage For women
In an order to beat men in the dowry game, all the woman should remember that they have the advantage of numbers on their side. The country has more men than women which mean that they should be the ones who should be running after girls and paying the price, known as dowry to the women. The writer says that if the girl is determined, has the support of her parents and there is a change in our perverted culture, then only the dowry would stop.
In the end, its written that if women can “Bend it like Beckham” why they cannot “Hit Dowry for a six”.
Hitting Dowry For A Six Summary: Question And Answers
Q: What is the difference between Nisha Sharma and Satyarani Chaddha’s case?
A: In Kalpana Sharma’s article “Hitting Dowry for a Six,” The Hindu, 1 June 2003, two famous cases of dowry have been portrayed which are Nisha Sharma’s case and Satyarani Chaddha’s case. The only difference between these two cases is that Satyarani Chaddha took a step against dowry after bearing the loss. She has to lose her daughter because of the evil of dowry whereas Nisha Sharma took a step earlier when her family realised that the laws’ demands have become unaffordable.
Q: What is the central issue as told in “Hitting Dowry for a Six”?
A: In the article “Hitting Dowry for a Six,” written by Kalpana Sharma, the central issue is that a woman is considered as a burden in her martial house and is expected to bring her facilities which in the end becomes facilities for the martial family. Such mentality is obviously inappropriate as there is no need for a woman to bring such facilities to her martial house or to be called a burden for providing the additional domestic help to her in-laws.
Q: What does the term “Hitting Dowry for a six” mean?
A: “Hitting Dowry for a Six” is the title used by Kalpana Sharma for her article that is written against dowry. The term has been used as a metaphor from cricket. To score a six in cricket, we need to throw the ball out of the boundary. Just like that in our society, we need to throw dowry out of the boundary but the ball is dowry and our society is the boundary and with the help of parental support and determination, we need to throw dowry out of that boundary.